India's bid for NSG Membership
When we all talk about India’s failure in getting Nuclear Supplier Group membership, This blog is to throw more light on what
NSG is all about and its background.

What is NPT ?
Before understanding what NSG is all about, one must know about the Non-Proliferation Treaty. NPT as it most commonly known is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament.
This treaty came into effect in 1968. It
recognized the countries that had nuclear weapons and that time as Nuclear
Weapon States and other signatories as Non-Nuclear Weapon states. The treaty
recognizes five states as nuclear-weapon states: the United States, Russia,
the United Kingdom, France, and China (also the
five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council). This
effectively means that the only those 5 countries are allowed to have nuclear
weapons and no other country can have nuclear weapons. India, did its first
test in 1974 -Smiling Buddha. And thus the only way for India to join this
treaty would be if it promises to not be nuclear weapon state.
Why India did not sign NPT?

The reasons for India
not signing the Non-proliferation Treaty are realistic. To better understand
why India did not sign the NPT, what actually is there in NPT can shed the
light and this explains India not signing NPT
1. According to NPT,
only the Horizontal Proliferation is prohibited and not the vertical
proliferation i.e. no new country except the p-5 (US, UK, Russia, China and
France) can proliferate the nuclear weapons. And the trickiest part is that there
is no limitation or clause to limit further proliferation by the p-5 nations.
This means that p-5 can acquire as many weapons as they can but other nations
shouldn't dare to procure any. This is a clear discrimination and a move to
permanently geo-politicize nuclear weapons.
2. The NPT calls for
nuclear disarmament but There is not time bound plan of action for a complete
nuclear disarmament. This means that in no near time frame the wish of nuclear
weapon free world is going to be realized. More over the NPT has been extended
indefinitely in 1995 which means neither the p-5 nations nor the
signatories are realizing the goal.
3. The membership from
NPT can be withdrawn by any nation with a 3-month prior notice period. That is,
a nation can avail all the benefits of the NPT like nuclear commerce, become
itself self-sufficient in technology and withdraw from the NPT and continue
with its nuclear programme. This is what exactly happened with North Korea in
2003. For a country like India which is committed to Complete Global Nuclear
Disarmament this may be unpalatable and the very loophole of NPT.
4. India needs a
minimum nuclear deterrent: If India signs the NPT as a Non-Nuclear Weapons
State, India cannot even keep a minimal nuclear deterrent. In the light of the
wars waged with neighbors China and Pakistan, this option seems suicidal; given
China and Pakistan themselves have nuclear weapons. Therefore even popular
political support, across the political spectrum, has been towards nuclear
weapons program, rather than signing the NPT
5. According to NPT all
the civilian nuclear establishments have to be brought under the surveillance
of "International Atomic Energy Agency" (IAEA). But the IAEA has been
questioned of its relevance after Iran has been caught in 2002 with its highly
enriched uranium heavy water reactor at Arak.
Apart from the above reasons despite of NPT, and
having the responsibility of protecting other nations from acquiring nuclear
weapons, some of the p-5 countries especially USA and China have been soft
towards certain states like Pakistan and even are accused of helping them
procure the weapons. This is nothing but the fence feeding on the crop.
The above reasons beyond doubt explain the
India's refusal to sign NPT.
More over India has a self-imposed moratorium on any further
Nuclear weapon tests and Transfer of nuclear technology and even officially
committed to Nuclear Disarmament. So no specific necessity to sign NPT in
separate
What is Nuclear Supplier
Group (NSG) ?
NSG is a group of nuclear supplier countries
that seek to prevent nuclear proliferation by controlling the export of
materials, equipment & technology that can be used to manufacture nuclear
weapons. It was founded in response to the Indian nuclear test in May 1974
& first met in Nov 1975. It test demonstrated that certain non-weapons
specific nuclear technology could be readily turned to weapons development. It
has a total of 48 members now.
Why is India seeking to become a member of NSG ?
•India wants to become a player in this
international arena where nuclear commerce norms are laid.
•If India becomes a member it will have better
international market for export as well as for import of nuclear related
materials.
•For building nuclear reactors, for providing
energy we need nuclear materials .By becoming a member of NSG we can have
better access of nuclear materials.
•All nuclear based programmes of India is being
run on indigenous technology. By becoming a member of NSG we will have access
to sophisticated foreign technologies.
•By becoming a member India can also sell its
Indigenous technology thereby giving Make In India a facelift.
Argument in favour for India Joining NSG.
Background for Membership.
In 2008, the NSG
exempted India from the requirement adopted by the NSG in 1992 banning nuclear
cooperation with any state that had not accepted IAEA comprehensive safeguards.
It allowed India to engage in nuclear trade with NSG members. ( But this
exemption may be withdrawn anytime and thus India wants membership in NSG)
It got the
exemption on the basis of certain nonproliferation commitments to which it
agreed under the India-US Civilian Nuclear Agreement. They
include:
- Separating its civil and
military nuke facilities in a phased manner.
- Placing civil nuclear
facilities under IAEA safeguards.
- Signing and adhering to the
IAEA’s Additional Protocol.
- Continuing its unilateral
moratorium on nuclear testing that no more nuclear tests will be conducted
by India.
- Working with the US for the
conclusion of FMCT.
- Refraining from the transfer of
enrichment and reprocessing technology to states that do not have them
& supporting international efforts to limit their spread.
- Intro comprehensive export
control legislation to secure nuclear material.
- Adhering to the MTCR and NSG guidelines
India deserves NSG membership due to following reasons:-India has established itself as a responsible nuclear stateo Declared a voluntary moratorium on further underground nuclear testso Effectively acted in sense and spirit of NPT/CTBTo India has Nuke weapons only as a minimum deterrence & pledged NFU (No First Use) unless faced with an attack of weapons of mass destructionIndia’s nuclear doctrine is unique. It is non-offensive, non-proliferative and only for deterrence.India is prepared to accept full-scale IAEA safeguards.India has already acquired high-level expertise in the peaceful use of nuclear energy in industry, power, agriculture and health care.India’s membership shall not only benefit it but also encourage civil nuclear trade globally without compromising on world peace and harmony.- Separating its civil and
military nuke facilities in a phased manner.
China Blocks India’s
NSG bid
China picked the
nitty-gritty of technicality that India is a non-NTP member, hence should not
be allowed an entry in NSG. It said that no exceptions should be made for
countries who are not signatories of the treaty. Brazil, Austria, New Zealand,
Ireland, South Africa and Turkey too were against India’s bid, and backed China.
However, many believe
that it wasn’t much about the technicality but rather geostrategic ambitions of
China to remain a dominant force in Asia. There are a string of practical
reasons why China was against India NSG membership from the get go.China
doesn’t want India to have access to all the latest Nuclear technology;
technology, with which, India can stride significantly fast in its development
agenda by emitting less carbon, depending less on fossils and advancing leaps
in its research and technology sector.
Voting against the
membership bid, China also thwarted India’s uranium supply. Also, as a NSG
member, India could have strongly presented its case for a seat of United
Nation Security Council (UNSC), which it can’t now.Beside all these, it’s not a
secret that China has much stronger strategic ties with Pakistan, a country
that unsurprisingly didn’t want India in this influential group. In a way,
China was likely batting for Pakistan. If India would have granted any NSG
exemptions, Pakistan too could have somewhat presented its case in front of the
Nuclear Suppliers Group members. Pakistan as well was bidding for NSG
membership, countering India’s efforts, fully aware that few countries would
really buy its contention. In fact, Pakistan’s application was not discussed at
all at the meeting. So, China did its part; blocked India’s entry and continued
to play ‘good friend’ with Pakistan.
Why are New Zealand, Turkey, South Africa and Austria opposing India's entry to NSG ?
India and South Africa share a historical relationship. They also have common concerns relating to global governance reforms and sustainable development. India was also an ardent supporter of the South African ruling party, African National Congress (ANC), during its struggle against the apartheid regime. . Commercial relations have flourished with bilateral trade now standing at USD 15 billion; and India’s investments in the country was pegged at USD 6 billion in 2014. India and South Africa have joined hands for the formation of multilateral groupings such as the IBSA and IORA, and are also members of others such as BRICS and BASIC.

India and South Africa share a historical relationship. They also have common concerns relating to global governance reforms and sustainable development. India was also an ardent supporter of the South African ruling party, African National Congress (ANC), during its struggle against the apartheid regime. . Commercial relations have flourished with bilateral trade now standing at USD 15 billion; and India’s investments in the country was pegged at USD 6 billion in 2014. India and South Africa have joined hands for the formation of multilateral groupings such as the IBSA and IORA, and are also members of others such as BRICS and BASIC.
The change in the South African position may have something to do
with the growing Chinese influence in the country. China’s relations with South
Africa have deepened in recent years. The year 2014 was termed the “Year of
South Africa in China”, while 2015 was marked as the “China Year in South
Africa”. In December 2015, South Africa hosted the second Forum of China-Africa
Cooperation (FOCAC) summit and the 6th ministerial conference at Johannesburg.
Trade between the two countries is booming; the latest reports suggest that the
value of two way trade is around USD 20 billion. Indeed, China has become South
Africa’s largest trading partner. It seems that the ANC-led government is quite
enamored with China. The 2015 ANC foreign policy discussion document applauds
“the exemplary role of the collective leadership of the Communist Party of
China” and hails China as “a guiding lodestar of our own struggle.”Such
statements suggest that South Africa may be in the process of making a
geopolitical pivot towards China.
The bilateral
relations between China and Ireland have developed smoothly ever since the two
countries signed the Communique on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations on
22 June 1979 and exchanged ambassadors in 1980. An estimated 6,000 Irish people
live in China, including around 4,000 in Hong Kong. Bilateral trade between
Ireland and China is worth over €8 billion each year.
China established
formal diplomatic relations with Austria on May 28, 1971 starting from then The
trade value of the two countries came to US$ 1.37 billion in 2002 and currently
it is lot higher.
The international
relationship between the People's Republic of China and New Zealand is growing
stronger. The establishment of diplomatic relations between the two sovereign
states was announced in December, 1972. Between 2009 and 2014, total goods
trade between New Zealand and China doubled to NZ$20 billion. New Zealand goods
exports to China grew 50% in June 2014. Later with NZ-China Free Trade
Agreement this relation even became stronger. India’s relation with its
neighbor Australia might also be a reason for New New Zealand’s stand regarding
NSG bid. Apart from these New Zealand seem to be softening their position on
India's NSG membership.
Turkey and
Pakistan have always been maintained at a decent level and in a friendly manner
since 1947 as both have common cultural heritage whose roots are ingrained in
history. In the past, each society offered assistance to the other when it was
in need of help. For instance, Indian Muslims in the area known today as
Pakistan helped the Turkish people during the Turkish War of Independence that
took place directly after WWI. Pakistan was one of the countries that offered
the most assistance to Turkey after the 1999 Marmara Earthquake. Alternately,
the Turkish people have also afforded the Pakistani people significant
assistance after the disastrous earthquakes and floods that hit the country in
the 2000′s. Apart from this both nations have good trade relations too.
How can India become NSG
member now?
India has been engaging with the
NSG since 2004. But it was only this May 12 did it made its application for the
membership formally.
The good news is, despite
China’s stubborn opposition, the NSG is likely to meet again at the end of this
year to discuss the provisions of letting Non-NPT signatories to join this
elite group. Meaning, India will have yet another chance to get the membership.
Regardless, if NSG is to meet at the end of this year,
India must steer clear of the biggest obstacle- China. The concerns and issues
of member countries opposing India’s entry- whether on technicality or other
reasons- must be addressed diplomatically.
Great article by the great author, it is very massive and informative but still preaches the way to sounds like that it has some beautiful thoughts described so I really appreciate this article. Best Selbstverteidigung waffen service provider
ReplyDelete